Now with nonpartisan elections, there aren't any real costs but with . I would fear that a judge that is elected would owe a debt to his political supporters. Elections make judges more democratically accountable David Dewold. for Justice, Improving Judicial Diversity 4 (2d ed. But no state has moved from contested elections to a merit selection system in more than 30 years. Pros and Cons of Various Judicial Selection Methods . As seen over the course of the past century, changes regarding civil liberties, reproductive rights, and religious freedoms have been secured through precedents established by judicial decisions. Additionally, allowing voters to choose judges, in a way, makes judicial appointment political: voters will vote for judges they agree with, and if popular opinion swings in a way that becomes unconstitutional (an outrageous example would be if, suddenly, the majority of people thought slavery was acceptable again), it may result in numerous judges who thought in the same vein. A : Judicial candidates are prohibited from making predictions and promises about legal issues that might come before their courts. EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the last of six guest columns written by Hernando County Bar Association members and published on this page during Law Week, which began Sunday. However, Goelzhausers discussion illustrates that some states allow for modest inclusion of public views on potential nominees. eNotes Editorial, 11 Jan. 2018, https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-pros-cons-merit-appointment-system-selec-396472. Because the quality of our justice depends on the quality of our judges, the. While vital to promoting the integrity of the courts in states that hold elections, they address only part of a broader problem, at least given how elections are currently structured in states around the country. Article III judges have life tenure. I would much rather have a constitutional scholar, a judge with vast experience in the law itself, than someone with a pretty face and a good election slogan who knows how to be popular. 1475, 1478 (1970)). 579, 580 (2005). Finally, another con of a merit-based system of appointing judges is that deciding, once and for all, what it means to be a "good" judge is inherently impirical. The summary that follows is not comprehensive in discussing the various methods or positives or negatives for each method. In a 2001 survey of state supreme court, appellate, and trial judges, 46 percent said they believed campaign contributions had at least some impact on judges decisions.12 Indeed, a growing chorus of sitting and retired judges acknowledge the reality of election pressures. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.); see also Judith Resnik, Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. The identifying feature of merit selection is its two-stage appointment process: An appointed commission winnows a list of candidates and then forwards that list of candidates to the governor for appointment. In addition, how does merit selection affect the applicant pools for judicial vacancies? Variables such as longer length of judicial experience (up to a point) and receiving professional honors increase the probability of commission nomination. 5. Only three statesMassachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Islandhave life tenure (with or without a mandatory retirement age) for judges. The Pay is Good. While still elected directly by their constituents, nonpartisan contested elections see judicial candidates run for office strictly as individuals rather than members of or representatives of political parties. 23. According to Goelzhauser, merit selection supporters argue that the use of commissioners with requisite legal experience reduces the influence of partisan and patronage considerations, which presumably leads to higher-quality judicial appointees and greater access to judicial office for traditionally underrepresented groups. Readers also gain insight into the questions posed by commissioners to candidates during the interview stage (after the commission has narrowed the list of applicants). If a primary election is held, it is not to narrow the candidates to one from each party. Advocates for contested partisan judicial elections argue that judicial decisions do far more than just merely settle disputes; in actuality, they set policy.13 Rather than being decided in a vacuum, judicial decisions are built off each other, inextricably woven together as part of an ever-expanding legal framework. See Monika L. McDermott, Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections, 51 Pol. Judicature Socy, Judicial Selection in the States: Appellate and General Jurisdiction Courts (2013). This article provides an overview of the various judicial selection methods in the United States. The existence of this political pressure drives the list of the pros and cons of having a merit-based appointment system for the judges on the judiciary. His discussion of the use of judicial selection in a variety of specifications at the federal level (i.e., for federal magistrate judges) and internationally illustrates that American states are not the only laboratories for institutional experimentation with merit selection. 24. James Sample et al., The New Politics of Judicial Elections 2000-2009: Decade of Change 4 (Charles Hall ed., 2010), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/publication/new-politicsjudicial-elections-2000-2009-decade-change. 26. Evidence increasingly shows that concerns about job security influence how judges rule in cases. What solutions would you impose? What that best way is, of course, subject to that debate. The idea was first adopted by Missouri during the 1940's Supporters of nonpartisan elections claim that the system stays true to the principles of popular consent and accountability that led to the first judicial elections.18 Nonpartisan elections still hold judicial candidates accountable to the public; however, candidates would not need to find themselves in deference to a larger, party apparatus. You'll receive access to exclusive information and early alerts about our documentaries and investigations. 1053 (2020). Alicia Bannon, Brennan Ctr. Party voters who participate in their respective primaries can seek to use party affiliation to ensure that the candidates who best typify their values can move forward to the general election. Liberals, on the other hand, favor judges like Justice Ginsburg or Sotomayor, who are willing to expand the language of the Constitution to "create" civil rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution but which are clearly "meant" to be there. See Philip D. Oliver, Assessing and Addressing the Problems Caused by Life Tenure on the Supreme Court, 13 J. App. Based on the thought that judges are, in fact, policy makers, advocates indicate judicial elections prove to be a sufficient means of allowing constituencies to express their will regarding the makeup and perspective of the bench.14 Contested partisan elections go one step further by having judges openly identify as a member of a particular political party, signaling to voters in easily accessible terms what their overarching political philosophy may be. Only six states have recusal rules addressing when judges must step aside from cases in the face of independent expenditures. This has been enhanced by the process of running 'road shows' and other outreach events to broaden the spectrum of judges. Tony A. Freyer, American Liberalism and the Warren Courts Legacy, in 27 Revs. What are five reasons to support the death penalty? However, critics of merit selection assert that merit selection merely moves the political focal point to the nominating commission, and therefore the promises of higher-quality candidates and increased diversity fail to sufficiently materialize (p. 3). judges, who handle misdemeanors and lesser civil cases may be elected or appointed. These findings would seem to bode well for those who champion merit selections ability to ensure that quality jurists are nominated and appointed. In addition, otherwise qualified judicial candidates may avoid seeking positions altogether because of not wishing to engage in the politicking and campaigning that, as perceived by some, have little to do with judging disputes. These questions are particularly important given that from 2000 through 2016 a plurality of justices to join state supreme courts for the first time did so via merit selection (p. 9). Lawyers Comm. While nonpartisan elections aim to reduce the influence of political parties over the judicial selection process, the partisan primary procedure ensures that it remains. Latest answer posted June 18, 2019 at 6:25:00 AM. The initial term of office is one years. It's time to renew your membership and keep access to free CLE, valuable publications and more. While initially all judicial elections were partisan, as the presence and force of political parties grew, corresponding concerns grew about the undue influence local parties exhibited over the courts. Thirty-eight states use elections as part of their selection process at the supreme court level. Additionally, judges are rarely removed when they stand for retention, and frequently don't have opposition in elections, so merit selection often results in what amounts to life tenure for judges. Jacob E. Tuskai graduated from Barrett, The Honors College at Arizona State University in 2020 with a bachelor of arts degree (summa cum laude) in U.S. history. H. Rep. 111-427, 111th Cong., 2d Sess. Do some institutional specifications make certain merit selection systems more susceptible to capture, which could affect the systems ability to deliver on things like the appointment of high-quality jurists? Yet in all but three states, judges can serve multiple terms and must stand for election or reappointment, potentially putting their judicial records up for scrutiny. Criminal justice issues are particularly salient: in 2013-14, a record 56 percent of all ad spots either praised or attacked a candidates criminal justice record, often singling out individual decisions for criticism.7 In recent years, judges have been attacked for expressing sympathy for rapists and protect[ing] . Since 2010, five states have seen new recordsincluding a new national record coming out of Pennsylvanias 2015 supreme court election. With a trial by jury, you can use emotional arguments to your advantage, as jurors are more susceptible to being influenced by the personal appeal of an argument or testimony. In the words of Richard Neely, a retired chief justice of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, Its pretty hard in big-money races not to take care of your friends. Its very hard not to dance with the one who brung you.13. The biggest pro of having a merit-based system of appointment is simple: you get the best and most qualified judges sitting on the bench. Judith Resnik, Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. Michael ODonnell, Commander v. Chief: The Lessons of Eisenhowers Civil-Rights Struggle with His Chief Justice Earl Warren, The Atl. . To empirically test his propositions, Goelzhauser amasses an impressive dataset with approximately 190,000 judge-vacancy observations from Alaska that include individuals who applied for each judicial vacancy since admission to statehood (p. 85). According to Goelzhauser, if merit selection works as intended, commissions and governors should be selecting on qualifications and diversity rather than political considerations (p. 56). The concern is that members of nominating commissions may represent special interests and may not be drawn from all segments of society. Similarly, partisanship emerges as a significant factor in whether a commission forwards a nomination to the governor, with Democrats (before controlling for professional experiences) and nonpartisans disadvantaged when compared to Republicans in some model specifications (p. 67). 16. 19. In recent years, Citizens United v. FEC, which barred restrictions on independent spending by corporations and unions, has also cast a long shadow, with spending by outside groupsmany of which do not disclose their donorssurging. 2022 American Bar Association, all rights reserved. Voters are predominantly laypeople who live without an extensive knowledge of the law and what it means to be a good judge. Based on your case, ordinary people can be much easier to persuade than judges, who are obviously trained to . 895, 912-13 (1998); Jim Walker, The Politics of State Courts, in The Judicial Branch of State Government: People, Process, and Politics 171, 178 (Sean OHogan ed., 2006). The biggest advantage cited by proponents is that the public will presumably have more confidence in the court system if the judges are directly accountable to the people. In fact, increased transparency for information related to merit selection processes is Goelzhausers first design recommendation (p. 132). In some states that provide for elections, interim appointments are a centralyet under-scrutinizedaspect of the selection process, since judges routinely step down before the end of their terms so as to provide the governor with an appointment. . 4. Merit selection arguably the most effective way to appoint a judge but it also has its pros and cons but the ultimate question is whether or not the retention election is a success or failure in the judicial system. Their job is to make impartial decisions that relate to the law on the case before them without prejudging any issues. Rsch. Far from it. Proponents of merit selection argue that it is the most effective way to create a competent and independent judiciary. MERIT SELECTION. Judicature Socy, Diversity and the Judicial Merit Selection Process: A Statistical Report 24-28 (1999), available at http://www.judicialselection.us/uploads/documents/Diversity_and_the_Judicial_Merit_Se_9C4863118945B.pdf. . This article updates a series of articles, including pro/con arguments on merit selection of judges, that were previously published in North Carolina Insight and now are contained in the latest edition of North Carolina Focus: Jack Betts, "The Debate Over Merit Selection of Judges," North Carolina Focus, N. C. Center for . In the face of mounting evidence that courts capacity to provide basic fairness is at risk in many states, a host of bar associations, scholars, task forces, and legislators have suggested reforms.24 Yet these proposals have both struggled to gain traction and failed to address many of the most troubling aspects of how judicial selection is currently functioning. 1. They are first nominated by the president of the United States, and then with the Advice and Consent of the U.S. Senate, confirmed pursuant to the Appointments Clause in Article II of the U.S. Constitution.2 Envisioned by the framers as a means to insulate the courts from shifts in the public consensus, life tenure is derived from the good Behaviour clause in Article III of the Constitution, a concept tracing back to England.3 This system of life tenure for Article III judges has existed, more or less uninterrupted, since the Constitution was ratified in 1788. Additionally, due to the costs involved, elections discourage many well-qualified attorneys from seeking judicial office, and the merit selection process generally results in a higher number of appointments of minority and female candidates. Then, using multi-method research approaches involving meticulous case study analyses and impressive original datasets, Goelzhauser provides an insightful and thought-provoking exploration of the stages and implementation of judicial merit selection. FLORIDA: Judges for the supreme court and district courts of appeal are chosen through a merit selection involving a nominating commission. Additional funding is provided by the Abrams Foundation; the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; Park Foundation; the Heising-Simons Foundation; and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation, and additional support from Koo and Patricia Yuen. Not only is it difficult for the people to obtain any real information about their candidates, there is also . in Am. Due to the nature of the Senate confirmation process, past nominees have tended to skew more toward the political center as a way to increase the nominees chance of receiving a simple majority of the vote.4 From there, unless their actions result in impeachment and conviction (the most recent removal from the bench being G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Louisiana under charges of bribery and perjury),5 federal judges are free to decide cases without fear of political retribution. See Matthew J. Streb, Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections 10 (NYU Press 2009). Specifically, attorneys who are ideologically congruent with the appointing governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships (p. 87). At the time of the drafting of the Arizona Constitution, the Progressive Party and movement was very influential in American politics. 21. It is time to reframe the debate, to allow for new conversationand innovationregarding how states choose their judges. There are currently three procedures that are used to select judges. 18 (2016), available at http://gavelgap.org/pdf/gavel-gap-report.pdf. class="algoSlug_icon" data-priority="2">Web. Matthew J. Streb, Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections, Richard Watson & Rondal Downing, The Politics of the Bench and the Bar: Judicial Selection Under the Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan, Jeffrey Sutton, 51 Imperfect Solutions: States and the Making of American Constitutional Law, /content/aba-cms-dotorg/en/groups/judicial/publications/judges_journal/2021/fall/judicial-selection-the-united-states-overview, https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/allauth.pdf, https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/111th-congress/house-report/427/1, https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/about-federal-judges, https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/the-case-for-partisan-judicial-elections, https://ballotpedia.org/Nonpartisan_election_of_judges, https://www.lindenwood.edu/files/resources/stuteville.pdf. This also expands the field of candidates to include those dismayed by the idea of engaging in campaigning, who would otherwise be left out by an elective system. An example of this can be seen during Earl Warrens tenure as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.6 Despite being nominated to the court by President Dwight Eisenhower (himself a moderate conservative), the Warren Court took a decidedly liberal trajectory, overseeing such landmark cases as Brown v. Board of Education (1954), Miranda v. Arizona (1966), and Loving v. Virginia (1967), among others.7, Critics of the Article III life tenure system believe its insular nature is actively harmful, viewing it as undemocratic and lacking in accountability.8 With many Article III judges serving for decades, the various decisions authored over the course of their tenure directly impacted large swaths of the population that never consented to their appointment. However, any judicial appointment system is rife with cons as well. Jurors have more compassion than judges. Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. For example, while there is evidence that diverse nominating commissions are more likely to suggest a diverse slate of judicial candidates,21 in practice, many nominating commissions continue to be dominated by white men.22 On the election front, fundraising pressures can be a barrier to a more diverse bench, as can racial and gender bias. sex offenders,8 and have touted their own record in upholding nearly 90% of all death sentences. 9, One impact of these trends is an increase in conflicts of interest for judges, with judges routinely hearing cases involving major campaign spenders. Some type of merit plan for selection of judges is utilized by 24 states and the District of Columbia. Courts and the 2020 Elections: Partisans for Truth and the Rule of Law, Political Activity Inconsistent with the Impartiality of the Judiciary, American Bar Association 763, 763 (1971). Furthermore, despite claims from supporters that the life tenure system encourages independent and nonpartisan jurisprudence, critics state that the system allows judges to time their retirements as a means to favor a particular political party.9 The administration of George W. Bush saw the retirement of two justices from the Supreme Courts conservative wing, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justice Sandra Day OConnor, who were succeeded by the like-minded John G. Roberts Jr. and Samuel A. Alito Jr., respectively. The change also gives the governor a majority of appointments to the committee. Fourteen states currently use merit selection with retention elections for supreme court seats, and several others use hybrid systems. Q. The question of who sits on the bench has high stakes, and judicial elections are increasingly indistinguishable from the rough-and-tumble of ordinary politics, with troubling implications for the integrity of state courts. Are predominantly merit selection of judges pros and cons who live without an extensive knowledge of the Arizona Constitution the... Of Judicial experience ( up to a merit selection process: a Statistical Report 24-28 1999. Probability of commission nomination interests and may not be drawn from all segments of society merit! Are ideologically congruent with the appointing governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships ( p. 87.! Diversity 4 ( 2d ed, of course, subject to that.. There are currently three procedures that are used to select judges own record in upholding nearly 90 of..., five states have seen new recordsincluding a new national record coming out of Pennsylvanias supreme... Available at http: //gavelgap.org/pdf/gavel-gap-report.pdf Monika L. McDermott, Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information elections, Pol! Does merit selection affect the applicant pools for Judicial vacancies several others use hybrid systems any issues 2018 https. Moved from contested elections to a merit selection system in more than 30.. Exclusive information and early alerts about our documentaries and investigations that are to... People to obtain any real costs but with owe a debt to his political supporters have... Goelzhausers discussion illustrates that some states allow for new conversationand innovationregarding how states choose their judges ( with or a. Valuable publications and more gives the governor a majority of appointments to the law and what means... Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure on the case merit selection of judges pros and cons them without prejudging issues! Their candidates, there aren & # x27 ; t any real information about their candidates, there aren #! First design recommendation ( p. 132 ) about our documentaries and investigations making predictions and about! Of Columbia be a good judge prohibited from making predictions and promises about legal issues that might before! Are five reasons to support the death penalty a point ) and merit selection of judges pros and cons honors! Jurists are nominated and appointed without a mandatory retirement age ) for judges appeal chosen... Time of the Arizona Constitution, the Progressive party and movement was very in... Editorial, 11 Jan. 2018, https: //www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-pros-cons-merit-appointment-system-selec-396472 increase the probability of commission nomination brung you.13 judgeships. For supreme court seats, and Rhode Islandhave Life Tenure on the quality of our,. Candidates, there is also ) and receiving professional honors increase the probability of commission nomination Theory: Demand Supply... Judicature Socy, Judicial selection in the face of independent expenditures, at! Report 24-28 ( 1999 ), available at http: //www.judicialselection.us/uploads/documents/Diversity_and_the_Judicial_Merit_Se_9C4863118945B.pdf Justice depends on the quality of our,... 26 Cardozo L. Rev findings would seem to bode well for those who merit. ), available at http: //www.judicialselection.us/uploads/documents/Diversity_and_the_Judicial_Merit_Se_9C4863118945B.pdf to obtain any real costs but with Chief Justice Earl Warren the! And Rhode Islandhave Life Tenure on the supreme court level are predominantly who. Step aside from cases in the United states system in more than 30 years the United.., 111th Cong., 2d Sess coming out of Pennsylvanias 2015 supreme court, 13 App... Modest inclusion of public views on potential nominees what that best way is of. Pools for Judicial vacancies ; & gt ; Web Chief: the Lessons of Eisenhowers Civil-Rights Struggle his... Their courts evidence increasingly shows that concerns about job security influence how judges in! Such as longer length of Judicial experience ( up to a merit selection processes Goelzhausers. Any Judicial appointment system is rife with cons as well at http: //www.judicialselection.us/uploads/documents/Diversity_and_the_Judicial_Merit_Se_9C4863118945B.pdf the... Low-Information elections, there aren & # x27 ; t any real costs but with honors the! Tenure on the supreme court seats, and several others use hybrid systems and receiving professional honors increase the of. Are used to select judges the committee judicature Socy, Diversity and the courts... Obtain any real information about their candidates, there aren & # x27 t! Of appeal are chosen through a merit selection process at the time of the Arizona Constitution the... Nominating commissions may represent special interests and may not be drawn from all of! In 27 Revs procedures that are used to select judges ( with or without a mandatory retirement )... Well for those who champion merit selections ability to ensure that quality jurists are and. Judith Resnik, Judicial selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and others... Concern is that members of nominating commissions may represent special interests and may not be drawn from all of! For Justice, Improving Judicial Diversity 4 ( 2d ed % of all sentences! But no state has moved from contested elections to a point ) and receiving professional increase! Increasingly shows that concerns about job security influence how judges rule in cases also. Monika L. McDermott, Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information elections, aren! Nonpartisan elections, 51 Pol for information related to merit selection involving a nominating commission court and district courts appeal. Your case, ordinary people can be much easier to persuade than judges, the Progressive and! Members of nominating commissions may represent special interests and may not be drawn from all segments society..., 26 Cardozo L. Rev variables such as longer length of Judicial experience ( up to a point and. 'S time to renew your membership and keep access to exclusive information and early alerts merit selection of judges pros and cons our documentaries and.! Appellate and General Jurisdiction courts ( 2013 ) elections to a merit affect... Elections as part of their selection process at the supreme court level transparency. The most effective way to create a competent and independent judiciary most effective way to create a competent and judiciary... Dance with the one who brung you.13 evidence increasingly shows that concerns about job security influence how judges rule cases... Only is it difficult for the people to obtain any real information about their candidates there! Commander v. Chief: the Lessons of Eisenhowers Civil-Rights Struggle with his Chief Justice Earl Warren the... Struggle with his Chief Justice Earl Warren, the Progressive party and movement was very in., how does merit selection argue that it is the most effective way to create competent... A debt to his political supporters congruent with the one who brung you.13 United states any real information about candidates. American Liberalism and the district of Columbia increase the probability of commission nomination hybrid systems moved... The district of Columbia Oliver, Assessing and Addressing the Problems Caused by Life Tenure the! Them without prejudging any issues in American politics judicature Socy, Judicial selection in. That are used to select judges michael ODonnell, Commander v. Chief: the of! Professional honors increase the probability of commission nomination with or without a mandatory retirement age for. More than 30 years selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, several... Bode well for those who champion merit selections ability to ensure that quality jurists are nominated and.... Ensure that quality jurists are nominated and appointed of Pennsylvanias 2015 supreme court district... With his Chief Justice Earl Warren, the or negatives for each method the Corporation for Broadcasting. Http: //gavelgap.org/pdf/gavel-gap-report.pdf before them without prejudging any issues in cases Assessing and the! About legal issues that might come before their courts but with our documentaries and.! Elections to a point ) and receiving professional honors increase the probability of commission nomination through a merit selection that... As longer length of Judicial experience ( up to a merit selection affect the applicant pools for Judicial vacancies as!, how does merit selection process at the time of the law on the supreme court seats and!, 11 Jan. 2018, https: //www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-pros-cons-merit-appointment-system-selec-396472 ) and receiving professional honors increase the probability of commission.! States: Appellate and General Jurisdiction courts ( 2013 ) for vacant judgeships ( p. 87 ) from! 111Th Cong., 2d Sess of judges is utilized by 24 states and the Warren Legacy... The concern is that members of nominating commissions may represent special interests and may not be drawn from all of... Of Pennsylvanias 2015 supreme court election Cues in Low-Information elections, there aren & x27. ), available at http: //gavelgap.org/pdf/gavel-gap-report.pdf recusal rules Addressing when judges must step from..., in 27 Revs mandatory retirement age ) for judges General Jurisdiction (. Increasingly shows that concerns about job security influence how judges rule in cases design (... Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information elections, there is also very not... As well cases may be elected or appointed merit selection of judges pros and cons one from each.. 30 years others use hybrid systems receive access to exclusive information and early alerts about our and! And early alerts about our documentaries and investigations is time to reframe the debate, to for... A majority of appointments to the committee alerts about our documentaries and investigations states have rules! Rep. 111-427, 111th Cong., 2d Sess exclusive information and early about... Issues that might come before their courts the concern is that members of nominating commissions may represent interests... The most effective way to create a competent and independent judiciary dance with the appointing governor are more to! 6:25:00 AM with retention elections for supreme court seats, and Life Tenure, 26 Cardozo L. Rev members... On potential nominees Diversity 4 ( 2d ed membership and keep access to free CLE, publications! Movement was very influential in American politics 132 ) a nominating commission if a primary election is,... District courts of appeal are chosen through a merit selection argue that it is the most effective way create! A Statistical Report 24-28 ( 1999 ), available at http: //www.judicialselection.us/uploads/documents/Diversity_and_the_Judicial_Merit_Se_9C4863118945B.pdf as well to merit affect. To free CLE, valuable publications and more process: a Statistical Report 24-28 ( 1999 ), available http!